By: charlesbradley
Well done Ken. I sometimes use Scrum–, Scrum-, Scrum, Scrum+ and Scrum++ to think of Scrum teams in terms of evaluating them against the Framework. Anyone doing ScrumBut(with a significant But of...
View ArticleClik here to view.
By: Alex Rosales (@MrAlexRosales)
Hi Ken, Congratulations to you and Jeff for another excellent book. I can’t wait to read it in the coming days and discuss it with our Agile Vietnamese Community. Regarding the new phrase, “Scrum And”,...
View ArticleBy: Vinay Krishna
Hi Ken, Nice to read this thought! I have worked on similar thought and created a decision matrix to identify whether it’s a ScrumBut or ScrumAnd. Please find below the URL of my paper:...
View ArticleClik here to view.
By: Peter Saddington (@agilescout)
@Charles – Interesting… I too have used the Scrum+/- before. VERY cool.
View ArticleBy: wzedan
I am facing a lot of but as we are a system integrator with always fixed cost projects and very rigid functional roles, also there is a big experience gap between team members that requires someone to...
View ArticleBy: skippletcher
The backlog clearly lasts for the life of the product. There is a reasonable assumption that a product owner will own a product throughout its lifetime (or at least through several releases). Is there...
View ArticleBy: kenschwaber
The same development team(s) with the relationship and trust of the product owner would be greatly effective. Switching people, teams, and trust loses a lot, even though it is frequently done. Best, Ken
View ArticleBy: Ken Schwaber, an Agile Avenger Fighting Against Waterfall « Indie Code
[...] Scrum (0 through Scrum +5) and that multiple threads within a business mature at different paces (see more at Ken’s blog). I believe he said most companies are at level 1 or 2 but should strive...
View ArticleClik here to view.
By: halasaleh1
Love this – using Scrum as the core, then adding or removing layers. I can’t wait to share it!
View ArticleBy: Minimum Requirements for Agile | Development Block
[...] Scrum-But concept, but not quite a strict. Even Ken has lightened up on his stance a bit recently replacing Scrum-But with Scrum And. Bob asks in his post… However, is there a point of...
View ArticleBy: Illya Pavlichenko
Nice post, Ken. I’ve read your book Software in Thirty Days and it’s awesome. Anyway – the concept of Studio looks for me very similar to the concept of PMO (Project Management Office). Providing...
View ArticleBy: Markus Holland
Hi Ken. The Scrum-And concept is just what I was looking for – because there are some regulations that can`t be met by pure scrum (i.e.: independence of quality assurance).Better to build a Scrum-And...
View ArticleBy: Kurt crowley
I think “scrum, and” has some value but I wouldn’t say you’re replacing, as there is rampant “Scrum, but” meaning the “cherry picking” of concepts that are convenient and palatable. I use a cooking...
View ArticleBy: Scrum Plus: Agile Heresy No More! » Agile Scout
[...] was strictly additive. But no longer is it the case, thanks to Schwaber himself, who went on record with his plea for “Scrum And” in April, [...]
View ArticleBy: ‘Scrum And’ term coined | Content Presenter
[...] Time went by, and I almost forgot about this exchange with Ken, until recently, while preparing a blog post about ‘Scrumbuts’ , I found this page on Ken’s blog: Scrum But Replaced by Scrum And....
View ArticleBy: Blasphemy! They Call It Scrum! » Agile Trail
[...] Ken Schwaber calls it Scrum And (“At the most basic level, the question is: Are you using Scrum or not … . Scrum And is [...]
View ArticleBy: Joshua Milane (@joshuamilane)
This is the point of Agility. It is supposed to allow cherry picking. Scrum Agile. Agile = “At regular intervals, the team reflects on how to become more effective, then tunes and adjusts its behavior...
View ArticleBy: Joshua Milane (@joshuamilane)
What happened to “work?” Nobody collects royalties on it, or can sell rights to “Working For Dummies” I suppose.
View ArticleBy: Scrum . . .A Simple Framework: Barnacles | Software Process and Measurement
[…] At the Scrum Gathering in Las Vegas in 2013, Dr. Alistair Coburn called these additions barnacles; Ken Schwaber has written extensively about “Scrum buts. . .” and “Scrum ands. . .”. Barnacles grow...
View Article
